What is imposter syndrome and how does it appear in the legal profession?
Emily Heird defines imposter syndrome as the tendency to attribute one’s success to external factors such as luck, timing, or circumstances rather than personal ability and effort—despite clear evidence of competence. For attorneys, this often manifests as a persistent fear of being “found out” or exposed as less capable than others believe.
She explains that lawyers might downplay their achievements, crediting wins to opposing counsel’s weaknesses or to chance. Praise from clients may also be dismissed as undeserved. The competitive nature of law amplifies these thoughts, as attorneys are constantly surrounded by high-performing peers and operate in environments designed to challenge and critique their arguments. Additionally, working in male-dominated or homogenous spaces can intensify imposter feelings, particularly for women and minorities who may struggle with belonging in those environments.
How does imposter syndrome differ from typical nervousness or performance anxiety?
While nervousness is situational and temporary, imposter syndrome is a chronic mindset that colors how attorneys view their abilities and professional worth. According to Emily, pre-trial nerves, for instance, are normal and often dissipate after the event. Imposter syndrome, however, persists before, during, and after performance-related moments. Lawyers experiencing it may over-prepare before a trial, then focus excessively on perceived mistakes afterward instead of recognizing their successes. This ongoing cycle reinforces self-doubt and drains emotional energy.
How does imposter syndrome impact a lawyer’s performance and well-being?
In the short term, imposter syndrome leads to cognitive exhaustion. Constant self-criticism causes overthinking, procrastination, and decision paralysis. Emily compares the internal critic to having an aggressive observer following you around, constantly highlighting your flaws. This “inner bully” triggers the same stress response—raising cortisol levels and leading to anxiety, burnout, and depression. Over time, these chronic stress patterns can erode motivation and efficiency.
Long-term, this mindset contributes to professional attrition. Many attorneys who experience prolonged self-doubt begin questioning whether they belong in the legal field at all. Emily notes that this sense of unworthiness, rather than true incompetence, is often what drives skilled professionals to leave law altogether.
What strategies can attorneys use to manage imposter syndrome in the moment?
Emily introduces a practical method called the PROVE framework, which helps individuals identify and challenge imposter thoughts:
- Pause and Label: Recognize when an imposter thought arises. Simply naming it—“This is an imposter thought”—creates emotional distance and weakens its power.
- Reality Test: Examine the evidence for and against the thought. Attorneys are skilled at building arguments, and this same analytical approach can help disprove self-critical beliefs.
- Observe Patterns: Identify recurring internal messages and note when they appear. Recognizing these patterns makes it easier to respond constructively.
- Values-Based Action: Take a small, confidence-aligned step forward even when doubt arises. Action, not avoidance, reshapes beliefs about capability.
- Externalize It: Give the inner critic a name or persona. One of Emily’s clients named hers “Judge Judy,” which made the voice easier to recognize and even laugh at.
Additionally, Emily recommends keeping a competence log, where attorneys record evidence of their skills, accomplishments, and successful outcomes. Reviewing this log when self-doubt strikes reinforces reality-based confidence.
How can attorneys build long-term confidence and internalize success?
To transform short-term confidence into lasting self-assurance, Emily suggests a structured reflection practice. At the end of each day, attorneys should write down three wins and explain why each was successful. This process not only acknowledges what went well but also connects those outcomes to specific skills or actions they contributed.
On a weekly basis, lawyers can expand this practice to include:
- Hard wins: Tangible accomplishments like closing a case or securing a favorable ruling.
- Soft wins: Moments of impact, such as mentoring a junior associate or receiving client appreciation.
- Growth moments: Instances of courage, even if imperfect, like speaking up in a meeting or tackling a new challenge.
Reviewing these logs monthly reinforces neural pathways that support confidence and self-trust, helping attorneys believe in their competence instead of doubting it.
What techniques help attorneys manage imposter feelings in high-pressure situations?
For courtroom appearances, partner meetings, or other stressful moments, Emily recommends the CALM method:
- C – Confidence Review: Recall prior wins or review notes from similar successful experiences to reaffirm preparedness.
- A – Anchor Phrase: Create a short, empowering mantra—such as “I belong here” or “I am prepared”—and repeat it to refocus the mind.
- L – Lower the Stakes: Imagine what advice you would give a mentee in the same position. Speak to yourself with that same empathy and confidence.
- M – Manage Physiology: Regulate the body’s stress response through deep breathing. Emily suggests the “physiological sigh”—two sharp inhales through the nose, followed by a long exhale through the mouth—which reduces anxiety and restores focus.
She also emphasizes shifting attention outward—toward the task, the client, or the argument—rather than inward on self-judgment. This external focus reduces anxiety and increases clarity.
How can mentorship and firm culture help reduce imposter syndrome?
Mentorship plays a critical role in dismantling imposter syndrome. Emily explains that younger associates often make “upward comparisons,” measuring themselves against senior partners without recognizing the years of growth behind that expertise. When mentors share their own experiences of self-doubt or professional missteps, it normalizes the learning process and builds psychological safety.
Creating an open culture where vulnerability is accepted helps attorneys see self-doubt as part of growth rather than a sign of weakness. Senior leaders can model this by openly discussing ongoing learning, adapting to new legal areas, and acknowledging imperfection as a natural part of mastery.
What first steps can attorneys take to start overcoming imposter syndrome this week?
Emily recommends three immediate actions:
- Start a “win archive.” Record two or three daily wins and what personal qualities contributed to them.
- Name the inner critic. Giving it a name makes it easier to identify and separate from your true voice.
- Recognize avoidance. Notice when you hold back from opportunities—whether speaking up, applying for a promotion, or volunteering for visibility—and choose to take one small step forward in confidence instead.
By applying these small yet powerful strategies, attorneys can gradually replace self-doubt with evidence-based confidence and reclaim the mental energy often drained by imposter thoughts.